Creating regional identity in a European periphery: Szeklerland 1918-1940.

You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialise correctly.

Dr. Stefano Bottoni

Panel 3 The Hungarian Minorities

Abstract

This paper analyzes the competition for the political and cultural integration of the Hungarian-speaking community of Szeklers into the Hungarian and Romanian national-states during the interwar period. A traditional East European peasant community facing the challenges of both modernization and state-building, the Szeklers first called for regional autonomy during the “Székely Kongresszus” held in Tusnádfűrdő/Tuşnad in 1902.

Further attempts by Szekler elites to endow their cultural identity as a Transylvanian nation with political content (a regional or even state entity) came in 1918–1919 after the region was incorporated into Romania, and again in 1940 after the Szeklerland was re-appended to Hungary under the terms of the Second Vienna Award. During the wars, intellectuals and writers like Árpád Páll challenged the mainstream Hungarian National Party’s (Országos Magyar Párt) conservative policy, actively promoted a new, more specifically Szekler identity.

Plans for territorial autonomy were also issued after World War II, giving the Romanian communist regime in 1952 grounds for conceding limited autonomy within the Szeklerland. This autonomous region was modelled on the Soviet's nationalities policy of the 1920s. The short-lived “autonomy from above” nevertheless had a significant impact on the self-image of the Szekler community, and contributed to the strengthening of an often ambiguous local identity, in which cultural, political and emotional elements still intertwine.

Biography

Stefano Bottoni has a PhD in European History from the University of Bologna (2005), and he is currently working as an assistant fellow at the Department of Public Politics of the University of Eastern Piedmont, Italy. In 2006 he was also awarded a post-doctoral fellowship by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. His main fields of interest are:

  • Nationality questions, nation-building models and minority issues in modern and contemporary Eastern Europe,
  • Hungarian-Romanian diplomatic relations after 1945,
  • Political and social history of Transylvania and Slovakia in the Communist period,
  • Ethnic conflicts in Eastern Europe and post-Soviet area after the fall of Communism,
  • State-Church relationships in Eastern Europe in the communist period.

Related Publications

  • Sztálin a székelyeknél: A Magyar Autonóm Tartomány története, 1952-1960 (Stalin and the Szeklers: A history of the Hungarian Autonomous Region, 1952-1960). Miercurea Ciuc/Csíkszereda: Pro-Print Kiadó, forthcoming.
  • Transilvania rossa: Il comunismo romeno e la questione nazionale, 1945-1965 (Red Transylvania: Romanian communism and the national question, 1945-1965). Roma: Carocci Editore, 2007.
  • Az 1956-os forradalom és a romániai magyarság (1956-1959) (The Revolution of 1956 and the Hungarian Minority in Romania). Miercurea Ciuc/Csíkszereda: Pro-Print Kiadó, 2006.
  • Federigo Argentieri (eds.). István Bibó: Il problema storico dell’indipendenza ungherese (The Hungarian Indipendence as a Historical Problem). Venezia: Marsilio Editore, 2004.

 

 

© 2011. All content, Pulse-Project.org